|
|
Guess or diagnosis?
Let me say right from the start that it is just not possible to diagnose fish disease and health problems without first examining the affected fish and possibly the fish's environment. After all, would you trust a doctor who told you what was wrong with you without asking any questions or carrying out any examination?
Would you phone up your vet and expect him to tell you over the
telephone what was wrong with the family cat or dog?
Obviously
the answer to both these questions is no.
Trying to guess what is wrong, (and that is all that people do if they don't carry out any investigation),
is obviously the wrong way to go about things, unless of course you
believe that aquarists and dealers have some form of mystical powers not
possessed by vets and doctors! Common sense and our own experience
tell us that the right way to proceed is to establish what is wrong and why, before we carry out any treatments.
Detective work
It is important to realise that fish are aquatic animals and can be
affected by most of the diseases that typically affect other animals, as
well as diseases and health problems that are exclusive to an aquatic
environment. However, unlike most terrestrial animals, they have a
limited response to disease. For example, you will not see a fish
holding up a sore fin, or limping or even whimpering. Their response is
limited to refusing food, lethargy, jumping, rubbing or flashing,
gasping at the surface and isolating themselves. There may be minor
variations, but essentially these are the only ways that they can let us
know there is something amiss.
The main point is that they will exhibit some of these signs
irrespective of what the problem is. So we see the same responses to
poor water quality, gill disease, parasites, heart problems etc. Given
that they will respond in much the same way, irrespective of the cause,
it is simply impossible to make a definite diagnosis based purely on
behaviour.
Trying to determine what is causing the problem is a little like
detective work as there are so many probable causes. Behaviour is just
one small part of the puzzle. The initial aim in diagnosing health
problems is to collect as much information as possible. When we have
this information we can then make a balanced assessment of both the
problem and the likely cause.
What information do we need?
Table 1 shows the most basic necessary information needed when
investigating health problems:
|
Table
1: Basic health work-up |
|
Investigation |
Reason |
|
1. Size of pond / tank. Number
and size of fish and type of filtration system
|
This tells us stocking densities and
whether the filtration is adequate. As stocking densities
increase water management and filtration become more important
More Information |
|
2. Any new additions. Any
treatments carried out in last 4 weeks
|
This may indicate a transmitted
disease, or a toxicity problem related to disease
treatments.
|
|
3. Behaviour over the last few
weeks and days
|
This may suggest the possibility
of certain health problems such as water quality, parasites
etc.
|
|
4. Are the problems affecting
all the fish or just one or two individuals
|
If more than one or two are affected it
will probably indicate a contagious condition and / or
environmental problems
|
|
5. Have they been suddenly
affected within a short period - usually days?
|
An acute problem usually indicates a
serious water quality problem or poisoning, especially if an
examination shows no other disease signs
|
|
6. Are the problems chronic - an
ongoing problem affecting them over a period of a few
weeks
|
This could indicate parasites,
bacterial problems or a background water quality problem
|
|
7. An examination in the water
to check behaviour, respiratory rate and any obvious physical
damage
|
This gives a very basic indication of
what sort of disease problems might exist
More Information
|
|
8. Carry out water quality tests
for ammonia, nitrite, pH, water hardness and history if
available
|
These may indicate a core water quality
problem or toxic conditions
More Information
|
|
9. Water tests for nitrate,
phosphate and dissolved organics
|
These may indicate background
pollution, poor maintenance or inadequate filtration
More Information
|
|
10. Examine system,
including filter, for water clarity, algal growth, solid
wastes:
|
This may indicate possible pollution
sources; whether photosynthesis is affecting pH or oxygen levels
and whether the system is poorly maintained
More Information
|
|
11. Examine a fish out of the
water, usually while it is sedated. It is not possible to
examine a fish while it is still in the water. Check skin, fins,
eyes, mouth, body and gills
|
We are looking for lesions, reddening
of the skin, fin-rot, visible parasites, the colour and
condition of the gills and any other visible signs of disease. See anaesthetics pages
|
|
12. A skin scrape, during which
a small amount of mucus is carefully removed with the back of a
scalpel or wooden spatula, so as not to damage the epithelium.
The sample is then examined under a microscope.
|
This examination will show whether
parasites are present; what sort and how many. The best sites
for sampling are just behind the operculum and along the back at
the base of the dorsal fin.
More
Information
|
|
13. A
gill biopsy or gill swab should be taken. The biopsy or swab is
then examined under a microscope
|
This will show
whether parasites are present in the gill; what sort and how
many. It will also give some indication of the condition of the
gill. |
|
14. If possible take a fecal sample for
microscopic examination
|
It may show signs of internal parasites
|
|
Print out your
own fish health work-up form |
With all of this information regarding the physical condition of the
fish and the environmental conditions it is, in most cases, possible to
determine both disease and the cause. From this we can decide what
actions and what treatments are needed.
If this basic examination is inconclusive it may be necessary to
carry out further investigation which could involve post mortem
investigations of recently dead fish, bacterial sampling from lesions to
determine the type of bacterium involved and their antibiotic
sensitivity, histological examination which involves preparation and
examination of body tissues and organs for signs of malfunction and
disease.
Although this may all look involved and unnecessary the success rate
of this type of methodical approach to fish disease diagnosis is far,
far higher and usually a lot cheaper than either guessing or making
simplistic diagnosis that only treat the obvious effects and not the
cause.
|
|